Coaching resource compiled from the Tyler McKay demonstration sequence
4 min
This resource provides a structured approach to taking the back from a De La Riva (DLR) guard position. Rather than treating back-takes as individual moves, the paper frames them as a logical progression based on the opponent's reaction to your guard. The goal is to provide coaches with a clear, safe, and progressive lesson plan that moves students from basic hip-line movement to full inversions.
For many students, the Berimbolo is often taught as a 'magic trick' without the necessary foundational movement. This paper argues that by teaching these three techniques as a family, coaches can help students develop the necessary hip mobility and grip awareness in a safer, more logical order. It emphasizes that the back is the ultimate goal, but if the rotation stalls, the student should be prepared to transition to a sweep or a stable top position, ensuring that the guard player maintains an advantage regardless of the outcome.
Sam: It sounds like the whole framework prioritizes the opponent's state over any fixed sequence — a shift from hunting a specific move to reading conditions and reacting. [[RP_SECTION:waiter-back-take-mechanics|Waiter back-take mechanics]]
Alex: That's the intended takeaway. There's a third technique in the guide, the Waiter back-take, built on the same logic but for a different case — when the opponent is standing but their base is already compromised.
Sam: How does that one work mechanically?
Alex: You isolate one of their legs, creating what the guide calls a tray, and use that to break their posture. Unlike the Berimbolo, there's no full inversion under the hips — you're stealing one pillar of their stance rather than rotating underneath them. Direction matters here too: pull the trapped leg while dragging the far hip toward you. Lift straight up and you're fighting their strength directly; pull on that diagonal and their free foot goes light instead.
Sam: And if they're heavy enough to resist the lift entirely?
Alex: Same logic as before — there's an abort built in. Failed elevation moves you into single-leg X or a sweep rather than forcing it. The back-take is the primary objective, but the sweep is the high-percentage fallback, not a failure state. [[RP_SECTION:prioritizing-conditional-flow|Prioritizing conditional flow]]
Sam: So across all three techniques, the actual skill being taught isn't a set of moves — it's reading weight distribution and knowing which branch is still open.
Alex: That's the frame the guide is built around. You stop hunting for one specific move and start reacting to what the opponent's base is giving you. It turns what looks like a chaotic scramble into something closer to a manageable, conditional flow.
Sam: If you want the grip specifics and the full sequencing for each transition, you can generate a deep dive on this guide — the material itself has the rest either way.
Alex: Thanks for listening.