Claudio Ottoni, Wolfgang Van Neer, Joris Peters, M. D. M. (MDM), V. R. (VR), P. S. (PS), M. B. (MB), B. M. (BM), T. D. C. (TDC), B. D. C. (BDC), F. A. (FA), P. C. A. (PCA), H. B. (HB), E. C. (EC), E. Cer (ECer), J. D. G. M. (JDGM), C. D. (CD), M. D. (MD), I. F. (IF), L. G. (LG), I. G. S. (IGS), H. C. K. (HCK), G. C. K. (GCK), M. M. (MM), R. M. (RM), C. M. (CM), V. O. (VO), T. O. (TO), M. P. (MP), B. P. U. (BPU), G. R. (GR), M. R. (MR), L. S. (LS), K. S. (KS), A. B. S. (ABS), U. S. (US), A. S. (AS), G. S. (GS), N. S. (NS), A. T. (AT), V. T. (VT), S. T. (ST), S. V. (SV), U. W. (UW), B. W. (BW), F. M. (FM), R. C. (RC)
3 min
This study aimed to resolve the long-standing uncertainty regarding the timing, origin, and dispersal routes of domestic cats (Felis catus) into Europe. Specifically, it investigated whether cats arrived alongside early Neolithic farmers or through later human-mediated processes, and sought to clarify the evolutionary relationship between domestic cats and the wildcat populations found on Mediterranean islands like Sardinia.
The researchers conducted a large-scale paleogenomic analysis of 225 ancient cat specimens from 97 archaeological sites across Europe and Anatolia, spanning from the 9th millennium BCE to the 19th century CE. They generated 70 low-coverage ancient genomes and 17 genomes from modern and museum specimens of wildcats. To ensure temporal accuracy, they performed direct radiocarbon dating on 37 of the remains. The team used autosomal trees, multidimensional scaling (MDS), and admixture analyses to compare the genetic signatures of these ancient samples against modern wild and domestic populations.
The genomic data reveal that the previously hypothesized "Neolithic dispersal" of cats into Europe is incorrect. Samples from the 9th to 3rd millennium BCE that were previously identified as domestic cats via mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) were actually European wildcats (Felis silvestris) that had acquired specific mtDNA lineages through ancient hybridization. True domestic cats (Felis lybica lybica/F. catus) only appear in the European archaeological record starting around 2,000 years ago. The study also identifies two distinct North African introductions: an earlier, isolated translocation of wildcats to Sardinia in the 1st millennium BCE, followed by the widespread dispersal of domestic cats across Europe during the Roman Imperial era, likely driven by maritime trade and the Roman military.
This research fundamentally corrects the timeline of human-cat cohabitation in Europe, shifting the narrative from a Neolithic agricultural association to a later, more complex process of Roman-era expansion. It also highlights the danger of relying solely on mitochondrial DNA markers, which can be misleading due to ancient hybridization events, and underscores the importance of whole-genome data in reconstructing the history of animal domestication.
Alex: So the history of the cat in Europe isn't one clean migration. It's more like several separate arrivals, each with a different origin.
Sam: That's the most accurate way to frame it. The "cat-like" presence in the archaeological record before two thousand years ago appears to have been local wildlife, not the domestic cats we know today. And the spread of true domestic cats lines up clearly with Roman military expansion—we see cats with modern domestic ancestry appearing at Roman sites as the empire grew. They were practical companions, brought along to manage rodents.
Alex: So it wasn't a natural migration at all. It was a human-driven one. That shifts the picture considerably—from cats wandering in with farmers, to cats being deliberately transported by an empire.
Sam: It does. And it's a useful reminder that genetic evidence is only as reliable as the methods used to read it. Reading one thread of DNA gave one answer. Reading the whole genome gave another. The story of how cats became part of European life turns out to be more recent, and more deliberate, than we thought.
Alex: Thanks for listening to ResearchPod.