Georgia Barbayannis, Mahindra Bandari, Xiang Zheng, Humberto Baquerizo, Keith W. Pecor, Xue Ming
4 min
This study investigates the relationship between academic stress and mental well-being among 843 full-time college students in the United States. As academic pressure is a primary stressor for this demographic, the researchers sought to identify how specific student subgroups—categorized by gender, race/ethnicity, and year of study—experience stress and how the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these challenges.
Researchers utilized two standardized instruments: the Perception of Academic Stress Scale (PAS) and the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS). The PAS measures stressors related to academic expectations, workload, and self-perception, while the SWEMWBS assesses positive mental health. The survey also included demographic questions and specific inquiries regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to compare stress and well-being scores across different student groups.
The study confirms a significant negative correlation between academic stress and mental well-being: students reporting higher academic stress consistently demonstrated lower mental health scores. Notably, non-binary students reported the highest levels of academic stress and the lowest mental well-being, while male students reported the lowest stress and highest well-being. Second-year students emerged as a particularly vulnerable cohort, reporting higher distress than their peers in other years. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic was identified as a universal stressor, with women, non-binary students, and upperclassmen reporting the most significant increases in stress due to the pandemic.
These findings highlight that academic stress is not experienced uniformly across the student body. The results suggest that universities should move away from "one-size-fits-all" mental health support. Instead, institutions should implement targeted interventions—such as time management workshops for second-year students and inclusive, specialized support for non-binary and marginalized students—to mitigate the long-term psychological impacts of academic pressure.
Academic stress may be the single most dominant stress factor that affects the mental well-being of college students. Some groups of students may experience more stress than others, and the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic could further complicate the stress response. We surveyed 843 college students and evaluated whether academic stress levels affected their mental health, and if so, whether there were specific vulnerable groups by gender, race/ethnicity, year of study, and reaction to the pandemic. Using a combination of scores from the Perception of Academic Stress Scale (PAS) and the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (SWEMWBS), we found a significant correlation between worse academic stress and poor mental well-being in all the students, who also reported an exacerbation of stress in response to the pandemic. In addition, SWEMWBS scores revealed the lowest mental health and highest academic stress in non-binary individuals, and the opposite trend was observed for both the measures in men. Furthermore, women and non-binary students reported higher academic stress than men, as indicated by PAS scores. The same pattern held as a reaction to COVID-19-related stress. PAS scores and responses to the pandemic varied by the year of study, but no obvious patterns emerged. These results indicate that academic stress in college is significantly correlated to psychological well-being in the students who responded to this survey. In addition, some groups of college students are more affected by stress than others, and additional resources and support should be provided to them.
Alex: [probing, analytical] So where does that leave the practical recommendation? What do they suggest an institution do with this? [[RP_SECTION:institutional-screening-recommendations|Institutional Screening Recommendations]]
Sam: [grounded, teaching mode] They propose proactive screening: administer the Perception of Academic Stress scale and the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale, and use the scores to identify high-risk cohorts before they reach crisis. The aim is a shift from reactive counseling to earlier, targeted intervention.
Alex: [skeptical, reflective] But if the validation sample under-represents the most marginalized students, a screening tool built on it could miss exactly those students.
Sam: [steady, precise] That's the fair objection. The sample can't tell you whether the screening thresholds or the risk profiles hold for those groups. So I'd read it as support for the screening approach, not a validated map of the whole student body.
Alex: [reflective] The reliable piece is the general association. The vulnerable-group findings are hypotheses for later work. [[RP_SECTION:future-research-directions|Future Research Directions]]
Sam: [concluding, steady] Right. What would settle it is longitudinal data that oversamples under-represented groups and follows students across the full four years. That could separate the direction of the stress–well-being relationship and test whether second year is really a pressure point.
Alex: [lightly] If you want the figures, the MANOVA details, and the caveats we skipped, you can generate a deep dive of this paper. The paper has the rest either way.
Sam: [warm, professional] Thanks for listening.