ResearchPod Summary
Reinforcement learning (RL) agents often struggle in environments with sparse rewards because they lack intermediate feedback to guide exploration. While potential-based reward shaping (PBRS) can provide this guidance without altering the optimal policy, it traditionally requires manual engineering of a potential function. This paper investigates whether vision language models (VLMs) can automatically learn these potential functions from image preferences, thereby reducing human effort and improving sample efficiency.
The authors introduce VLM-PBRS, a framework that uses a lightweight VLM to compare pairs of images and determine which state is closer to a specified goal. These preferences are used to train a potential function, which is then incorporated into the reward signal. Unlike previous methods that use VLMs to define the reward function directly—which can lead to reward hacking—this approach leverages the mathematical properties of PBRS to ensure that the agent's optimal policy remains unchanged, regardless of the potential function's accuracy. By using smaller, more efficient VLMs, the authors minimize the computational cost of repeated queries during training.
Empirical testing in the Meta-World and Franka Kitchen environments demonstrates that VLM-PBRS significantly improves sample efficiency compared to unshaped sparse-reward baselines. The authors show that even when small VLMs produce noisy preference labels, the resulting potential function still provides sufficient guidance to accelerate learning. Furthermore, because the framework is grounded in PBRS, it is robust to reward hacking, as the shaping term cannot incentivize the agent to deviate from the original task objective.
This work provides a scalable, low-cost solution for reward engineering in complex visual environments. By decoupling the potential function from the primary reward signal, it allows researchers to use off-the-shelf foundation models to guide exploration without the risk of biasing the agent toward unintended behaviors, effectively bridging the gap between high-level language goals and low-level control.
AI-generated third-party summary by ResearchPod. Not official content or an endorsement by the paper authors or affiliated organizations.