ResearchPod Summary
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often suffer from overthinking on simple queries, leading to excessive token consumption and increased latency. While existing methods attempt to compress reasoning chains, they often use uniform reduction or coarse-grained difficulty estimation, which can degrade performance on complex tasks. This paper asks: can we use a model's intrinsic confidence to autonomously modulate reasoning depth, balancing efficiency and accuracy?
The authors propose Confidence-Adaptive Thinking (CAT), a framework that leverages self-certainty—a measure derived from the model's internal token distributions—as a fine-grained indicator of reasoning quality and problem difficulty. The framework operates in two stages:
CAT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across multiple benchmarks (MATH-500, AIME24, and GPQA) on various base models. By integrating self-certainty, CAT achieves a superior balance between inference efficiency and reasoning accuracy. Specifically, it effectively reduces token overhead for simple problems while preserving the model's ability to explore complex reasoning paths for harder inputs. Ablation studies confirm that both the confidence-aware labeling and the weighted optimization objective are essential for maintaining performance while achieving compression.
This work provides a robust, model-intrinsic solution for the practical deployment of LRMs in industrial scenarios where both latency and accuracy are critical. By shifting the paradigm from external supervision to intrinsic confidence awareness, CAT offers a scalable way to make reasoning models more efficient without requiring external reward models or manual difficulty labeling.
AI-generated third-party summary by ResearchPod. Not official content or an endorsement by the paper authors or affiliated organizations.